Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ruled in support of wedding equality.
Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
Supporters of same-sex marriage argued that prohibiting homosexual and lesbian couples from marrying is inherently discriminatory and so violates the united states Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which need states to enforce their guidelines equally among all teams. When it comes to same-sex wedding, states’ bans violated the Amendment that is 14th because purposely excluded gay and lesbian partners from wedding rules.
The 14th Amendment “was created to, actually, perfect the vow associated with Declaration of Independence,” Judith Schaeffer, vice president of this Constitutional Accountability Center, stated. “the point and also the meaning for the Amendment that is 14th is explain that no state takes any number of citizens and work out them second-class.”
In 1967, the Supreme Court used both these standards in Loving v. Virginia as soon as the court decided that the 14th Amendment forbids states from banning interracial couples from marrying.
“This instance presents a constitutional question never ever addressed by this Court: whether a statutory scheme used by their state of Virginia to avoid marriages between individuals entirely on such basis as racial classifications violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses regarding the Fourteenth Amendment,” previous Chief Justice Earl Warren penned when you look at the majority viewpoint at that time. “For reasons which appear to us to mirror the main concept of those constitutional commands, we conclude why these statutes cannot stay regularly using the Fourteenth Amendment.”